Saturday, November 22, 2008

Being fully human - accepting 9 aspects of life


(Click on the mind map image above for a bigger view.)

Becoming fully human, in my interpretation of Leo Buscaglia's book Personhood, challenge us to look at life as great gift and good - because of what it enables us to give others - rather than what we are getting out of it.

It encourages us to re-assess our perspective on the nine (9) aspects of life that includes:
  • Death
    "When we can embrace death as simply another aspect of the life cycle, we will give appreciation and value to each life encounter knowing that it will never occur again."

  • Self-determination
    "We must embrace ourselves as we are and as we have the potential to become before we can embrace life or others."

  • Connectiveness
    "Even the most insignificant act we perform will have some effect upon the world."

  • Purpose
    "Each act makes us manifest. It is what we do, rather than what we feel, or say we do, that reflects who and what we truly are. Each of our acts makes a statement as to our purpose."

  • Communication
    "No one can know us unless we are willing and able to tell them through our actions, as well as our words, who we are. We must be constantly engaged in verbalizing through language, gesture, or action our ever changing selves."

  • Doubt and uncertainty
    "Be as welcoming of the new as we are comfortable with the old, as fearless of the unexpected as we are falsely secured in the planned."

  • Spirituality
    "Reach out with total trust and touch the God in all things."

  • Frustration and pain
    "Fully functioning persons have the courage and strength of their despair. It alerts them to action and change."

  • Intimacy and love
    "Recognizing the need for others. A means for reflecting your vast potential and sharing them with others. All of this while maintaining autonomy and be challenge by differences - which will continue to stimulate them to growth."

(Postscript: Feb. 19, 2012)

I have a friend (and 2 industry peers) who passed away last year due to heart attack. Around 4 months before that, we met for his daughter's birthday and later found out of his health, financial condition.

Was offering help in my own small way but he refused. He was planning for his daughter's education (expecting to live a few years more) but at the same time citing he is ready to "go" anytime soon. Found out of his death 2 months after it happened. Was hurt that time. In one provincial road trip, I used the opportunity to connect with him in my memory and said goodbye.

When Steve Jobs passed away, his talks on accepting death as a fact of life reminded of what I first learned from Leo Buscaglia with this book. That is making a sincere attempt to make a connection when you meet people. Primarily because it is likely you'll never get to see them again. This is true in my case as opportunity to meet people usually stems from public face-to-face and online talks.

Also the reason why I don't engage on the same level when attacked online as damage that can be brought (based on past experience) will be irreparable to the other party. Although my instinct differs when people I care for gets treated unfairly.

Leo Buscaglia was recommended by a friend who kept insisting that I should read him. Buscaglia is the only love change master that I have to date. No other author has ever touched my mind on the subject as much as he did.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Thinking Effectively: Six Thinking Hats

(Click on the mind map image above for a bigger view. Once open, move your mouse to the image and your mouse cursor will change to a magnifying glass. Then click on it. Otherwise, use your browser's zoom feature. Was not able to follow the hat color in the mindmap creation process - sorry.)

(Updated - first version of this post was published in October 2005.)

While catching up with a good friend in October 2005, I got the chance to buy a copy of Edward De Bono's "Six Thinking Hats."

I'm so happy in finally getting the chance to get a copy of this book. It is a good compliment to books like Blink (by Malcolm Gladwell) and Thinking for a Change (by John Maxwell). However, I consider it more of a wrap-up as reading this alone won't be enough in developing good thinking skills.

In meetings and in communicating with people, face-to-face or e-mail, we usually encounter weird reactions. Some, instead of seeing a communication as a straight request for facts, will see it from a negative point of view, perhaps from prejudices, lack of trust, among others. This usually hampers us from getting things done. That is why there are some who will just vent in frustration, "can't we all just get along?"

No matter how much we try to learn in enhancing our thinking process, we have to go to the next level and set the tone of thinking with our peers too. This coincides with the 8th Habit of Stephen Covey, where one has to take the initiative of sharing knowledge and empower peers to think better and eventually lead effectively.

Misunderstanding and arguments often stems from looking at things in a different point of view concurrently. As a result, one will be very optimistic, the other takes the stand of a devil's advocate, another will just be plain obnoxious for personal reasons, among others. In this set-up, hardly anything gets achieved. Although Stephen Covey's 8th Habit taught us about Ethos, Pathos and Logos and the Think Win-Win concept, it is easier said than done.

The Six Thinking Hats method intends to make us broad-minded and multi-discipline in analyzing a situation being presented to us. In looking at a specific situation, everyone gets asked to wear a particular hat at a time, therefore allowing everyone to discuss thoughts at a specific point of view, where participants are on the same page, looking at the same thing.

For every situation or discussion we encounter, where a resolution must be arrived at the end, it is good to take the following pattern:

  1. The discussion leader wears the Blue Hat. This is the control hat that organizes the thinking needed to explore the subject at hand. Like a conductor of the orchestra, the blue hat thinker calls for the use of other hats. Although peers can also give comments and suggestions in this context as well.

    He or she defines the subject, sets the focus, defines the problems, and shapes the questions. He or she is responsible for summaries, overviews, and conclusions. The blue hat thinker monitors the thinking, stops abusive use of other hats, and insist on map type of thinking.

  2. The meeting or discussion is started by putting facts on the table. The person providing this information wears the White Hat. The white hat thinker is (or strives to be) neutral and objective, much like a computer, when processing and displaying information. No personal interpretation or opinion is provided. However, another person's interpretation or opinion can be mentioned, putting it forward as a fact. Two types of facts are presented by a white hat thinker. The first are the proven, checked or validated facts. The second are believed-to-be facts or likelihood that have not been checked or validated.

  3. It is ideal at the start and before ending a meeting or discussion, or whenever necessary, participants put the Red Hat. This gives the participants the right time and chance to vent their feelings about the subject matter without requiring or voluntary giving any form of justification to explain it. These feelings can vary from strong (fear, dislike, positive euphoria) to subtle emotions (suspicion). It also includes complex judgements type of feelings such as hunch, intuition, sense, taste, aesthetic feeling, and the non-visible justified types. The red hat thinking process allows participants to see if there is a change of perception at the start to end of discussion.

    I believe that wearing the red hat at the proper time, putting it under control, will give all participants greater level of productivity as they had to think through properly and take the necessary self-control of their feelings.

  4. Perhaps the most important hat is the Black Hat, as the thinker is concerned with caution and being careful. The black hat thinker considers risks, dangers, difficulties, obstacles, potential problems, and the downside of a suggestion. He or she checks if the suggestion put on the table fits the organization's past experience, policy, strategy, ethics, values, resources, known facts, and the experience of others.

    Black hat thinking should not be allowed to degenerate into argument. As its being cautious is the basis of a project's survival or success.

  5. If black hat thinking is considered as negative assessment of ideas being presented onto the table, Yellow Hat thinking is positive assessment. The yellow hat thinker probes and explores for value, benefit, logical fit, practicality, dreams, vision, speculation, opportunity seeking, and hopes. It is constructive and generative, resulting to concrete proposals and suggestions (creative new ideas are not included). He or she is concerned in making things happen or operational, effectively.

  6. If red and black hat thinkers are not controlled, green hat thinking hardly prospers. Green hat thinkers are the creative thinkers. The green hat is not only worn by the person presenting the creative output, but the listeners as well. The green hat thinker is in constant search for alternatives. The green hat thinker does not base one's decision on judgement but the movement resulted by an idea, as a provocation. Things that we see online and offline today that are totally or partly new, but very interesting, that caused us to act or adopt, can be seen as an output of those who were never afraid taking things further using the green hat.
The Six Thinking Hats can work in one organization if everyone is familiarize with it and will strictly enforce it during discussion. On a personal level, it also allows us to see beyond what is initially presented to us, triggering us to wear our red or black hat immediately and solely. We have to wear the six thinking hats to see things clearer and better.



Tuesday, November 04, 2008

IMMAP 2009 New Board


Last September 30, 2008, the Internet and Mobile Marketing Association of the Philippines had its election. Just now, we had our board meeting combining both old and new board.

Congratulations to the following incoming board members for 2009. Just now, they had an election and identified the primary leaders of the organization for 2009.
  1. Art Policarpio, SnapWorx Digital (President)
  2. Angeli Lambsdorff, DentsuIndio (Vice-President)
  3. Arlene Amarante, Microsoft Advertising (Secretary)
  4. Norelyn Babiera, Fiera de Manila (Treasurer)
  5. Jojit Alcazar, Wolfpac Mobile
  6. Joseph Albette Buddahim, P&G
  7. Hans Roxas-Chua, Ateneo Wireless/Blue Blade Technology
  8. Cris Concepcion, Yahoo Philippines
  9. Mon Duremdes, Mobile Arts
  10. Leah Besa-Jimenez, Proximity
  11. Bing Kimpo, Track Works
  12. Melissa Limcaoco, EGG
  13. Ed Mapa, Media Contacts
  14. Nix Nolledo, Xurpas
  15. Mike Palacios, Havoc Digital
I've been fortunate to be part of its founding board. It is great to see how much the organization has evolved and the number of activities it has undertaken to boost Internet and mobile promotion in the country.

Mabuhay IMMAP!